Control of Aspergillus postharvest rot on plum tomato by potassium metabisulfite and potassium sorbate

Suree Nanasombat

Department of Biology, School of Science, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand

Saranya Phunpruch

Department of Biology, School of Science, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2025.2

Keywords: Aspergillus potassium metabisulfite potassium sorbate GRAS salts

Abstract

In this study, fungal contamination of plum tomato fruits (Solanum lycopersicum) was preliminarily examined by the dilution plating method. The tomato samples were highly contaminated by molds and yeasts (1.0×105 – 1.4×108 CFU/g), including Aspergillus, Geotrichum, Penicillium, Rhizopus, Candida, Cryptococcus and Rhodotorula. The mold strains that contaminated the tomatoes to the greatest extent were Penicillium and Rhizopus. Three fungal isolates (Aspergillus niger T6D5, Candida guilliermondii T7D4 and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa T7D5) were selected for further in vitro study. Then, the antifungal activity of organic acids (citric and tartaric acids) and salts (potassium acetate, potassium metabisulfite and potassium sorbate) against molds and yeasts was investigated. Salt solutions showed higher inhibitory effects than did acid solutions. Interestingly, A. niger T6D5 showed the highest susceptibility to potassium sorbate and potassium metabisulfite at 0.01-1% (w/v) MIC, respectively, compared to other fungi. In yeasts, potassium metabisulfite effectively inhibited the growth of C. guilliermondii T7D4 and R. mucilaginosa T7D5 at 0.25% (w/v) MIC. The use of organic acids and salts to control the growth of A. niger T6D5 on tomatoes was investigated. Among all the salts and acids tested, 1% (w/v) potassium metabisulfite and 3% (w/v) potassium sorbate completely inhibited the growth of A. niger T6D5 on tomatoes.

How to Cite

Nanasombat, S., & Phunpruch, S. (2025). Control of Aspergillus postharvest rot on plum tomato by potassium metabisulfite and potassium sorbate . Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 30(01), APST–30. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2025.2

References

Ukeh JA, Chiejina NV. Preliminary investigations of the cause of post-harvest fungal rot of tomato. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2012;4(5):36-39.

Zhu Z, Chen Y, Zhang X, Li M. Effect of foliar treatments of sodium selenate on postharvest decay and quality of tomato fruits. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2016;198:304-310.

Kong J, Zhang Y, Ju J, Xie Y, Guo Y, Cheng Y, et al. Antifungal effects of thymol and salicylic acid on cell membrane and mitochondria of Rhizopus stolonifer and their application in postharvest preservation of tomatoes. Food Chem. 2019;285:380-388.

Rodrigues MHP, Furlong EB. Fungal diseases and natural defense mechanisms of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum): A review. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2022;122:101906.

Graham HF. Yeast in fruit and fruit products. In: Boekhout T, Robert, V, editors. Yeasts in food: beneficial and detrimental aspects. Boca Raton: CRC Press Woodhead Publishing; 2003, p. 267-287.

Chen RY, Jiang W, Fu SF, Chou JY. Screening, evaluation, and selection of yeasts with high ammonia production ability under nitrogen free condition from the cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme) rhizosphere as a potential bio-fertilizer. Rhizosphere. 2022;23:100580.

Domínguez I, Ferreres F, Pascual del Riquelme F, Font R, Gil MI. Influence of preharvest application of fungicides on the postharvest quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Postharvest Biol Technol. 2012;72:1-10.

Palou L. Postharvest treatments with GRAS salts to control fresh fruit decay. Horticulturae. 2018;4(4):46.

Romanazzi G, Sanzani SM, Bi Y, Tian S, Martínez PG, Alkan N. Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biol Technol.2016;122:82-94.

Food and Drug Administration. Code of federal regulations: ECFR: 21 CFR Part 182 — substances generally recognized as safe [Internet]. [Cited 2023 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B

Fagundes C, Pérez-Gago MB, Monteiro AR, Palou L. Antifungal activity of food additives in vitro and as ingredients of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-lipid edible coatings against Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria alternata on cherry tomato fruit. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;166(3):391-398.

Guimarães JER, de la Fuente B, Pérez-Gago MB, Andradas C, Carbó R, Mattiuz B-H, et al. Antifungal activity of GRAS salts against Lasiodiplodia theobromae in vitro and as ingredients of hydroxypropyl methycellulose-lipid composite edible coatings to control Diplodia stem-end rot and maintain postharvest quality of citrus fruit. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;301:9-18.

Kolaei EA, Tweddell RJ, Avis TJ. Antifungal activity of sulfur-containing salts against the development of carrot cavity spot and potato dry rot. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2012;63(1):55-59.

Askarne L, Talibi I, Boubaker H, Serghini Mohammed A, Boudyach EH, Ait Ben AA. Effects of organic acids and salts on the development of Penicillium italicum: The causal agent of citrus blue mold. Plant Pathol J. 2011;10(3):99-107.

Youssef K, Ligorio A, Sanzani SM, Nigro F, Ippolito A. Control of storage diseases of citrus by pre- and postharvest application of salts. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2012;72:57-63.

Tournas V, Stack ME, Mislivec PB, Koch HA, Bandler R. Yeasts, molds, and mycotoxins. In Bacteriological analytical Manual (BAM) [Internet]. [Cited 2016 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/food/ foodscienceresearch/laboratorymethods/ucm071435.htm

Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC., editors. Introduction to food and airborne fungi. 7th ed. Netherlands, Utrecht: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures; 2004.

Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D. Yeasts: characteristics and identification. 3rd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

Bellemain E, Carlsen T, Brochmann C, Coissac E, Taberlet P, Kauserud H. ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: as in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:189.

Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403-410.

Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(22):4673-4680.

Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022-3027.

Collins CH, Lyne PM, Grange JM. Collins and Lyne’s microbiological methods. 7th ed. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2001.

Moss MO. Morphology and physiology of Penicillium and Acremonium. In: Peberdy JF, editor. Penicillium and Acremonium. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1987, p. 37-72.

Chinedu SM, Enya E. Isolation of microorganisms associated with deterioration of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and pawpaw (Carica papaya) fruits. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2014;3(5):501-512.

Tsang C C, Tang JYM, Lau SKP, Woo PCY. Taxonomy and evolution of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces in the omics era – Past, present and future. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018;16:197-210.

Arslan U. Evaluation of antifungal activity of sulfur-containing salts against phytopathogenic fungi. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2015;24:1879-1886.

Martinez-Blay V, Taberner V, Perez-Gago MB, Palou L. Control of major citrus postharvest diseases by sulfur-containing food additives. Int J Food Microbiol.2020;330:108713.

Kowalczyk D, Kordowska-Wiater M, Zięba E, Baraniak B. Effect of carboxymethylcellulose/candelilla wax coating containing potassium sorbate on microbiological and physicochemical attributes of pears. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2017;218:326-333.

Chichester DF, Tanner FWJ. Antimicrobial food additives. In: Furia TE, editor. CRC Handbook of food additives, Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1972, p. 115-184.

Natskoulis PI, Lappa IK , Panagou EZ. Evaluating the efficacy of turbimetric measurements as a rapid screening technique to assess fungal susceptibility to antimicrobial compounds as exemplified by the use of sodium metabisulfite. Food Res Int. 2018;106:1037-1041.

Davidson PM. Chemical preservatives and natural antimicrobial compounds. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, Montville TJ, editors. Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers, Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1997, p. 520-556.

Jay JM, Loessner MJ, Golden DA. Modern food microbiology. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2005.

Ray B. Fundamental food microbiology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2004

Kaiser C, Hamm PB, Gieck S, David N, Long L, Meland M, et al. In vitro fungicidal activity of calcium and potassium salts on several commercially significant plant pathogens. HortScience. 2011;46(6):913-916.

Pundir RK, Jain P. Evaluation of five chemical food preservatives for their antibacterial activity against bacterial isolates from bakery products and mango pickles. J Chem Pharm Res. 2011;3(1):24-31.

Wiley RC. Preservation methods for minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. In: Yildiz F, Wiley RC, editors. Minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables, Boston, MA: Springer US; 2017. p. 187–238.